Apple recently released the iPhone 16, almost nine months after Samsung unveiled the Galaxy S24 series. Although these phones are similar in many ways and are the cheapest in their flagship ranges, they run on different operating systems. How do these two phones compare in other aspects? Is one better than the other? Which one is the superior choice based on your preferences?
Let’s compare the two phones and find out which one suits you better.
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: specs
Apple iPhone 16
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dimensions and weight
5.81 x 2.82 x 0.31 inches
6.0 ounces
5.79 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches
5.93 ounces
Display
6.1-inch Super Retina XDR display
1179 x 2556 resolution (460 PPI)
60Hz refresh rate
2,000 nits peak brightness
1 nit minimum brightness
6.2-inch FHD+
1080 x 2340 resolution (416 PPI)
120Hz refresh rate
2,600 nits peak brightness
1 nit minimum brightness
Processor
A18 chip
Six-core CPU
Five-core GPU
16-core Neural Engine
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
Eight-core CPU
Number of GPUs not announced by Qualcomm
Hexagon Processor
Rear cameras
Dual camera system
48-megapixel Fusion main
12MP ultrawide
Triple camera system
50MP main
12MP ultrawide
10MP telephoto
Front cameras
12MP selfie
12MP selfie
Storage and memory
8GB/128GB
8GB/256GB
8GB/512GB
8GB/128GB
8GB/256GB
AI
Apple Intelligence (coming soon)
Galaxy AI
Durability
IP68
IP68
Software and support
iOS 18
Six to eight years of software updates
Android 15
Seven years of software updates
Battery and charging
Up to 22 hours between charges
Unknown battery size
45W wired
30W wireless
4.5W reverse wireless
Up to 24 hours between charges
4,000mAh
25W wired
15W wireless
4.5W reverse wireless
Colors
Ultramarine
Teal
Pink
White
Black
Cobalt VioletAmber Yellow
Marble Gray
Onyx Black
Jade Green (Samsung exclusive)
Sapphire Blue (Samsung exclusive)
Sandstone Orange (Samsung exclusive)
Price
Starting at $800
Starting at $800
Review
4 out of 5 stars
4 out of 5 stars
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: design and display
Christine Romero-Chan / Digital Trends
At first glance, at least on the front, there isn’t much difference between the Samsung Galaxy S24 and the Apple iPhone 16. Both have rounded edges and similar aluminum bodies. The Galaxy S24’s display is a tad larger at 6.2 inches compared to the iPhone 16’s 6.1 inches, and you’ll notice two new buttons on the Apple phone (more on that below).
When turned on, the displays reveal more distinctions. Samsung’s phone offers a higher refresh rate and peak brightness, while the Apple device provides a sharper resolution. Both phones have the same minimum brightness, just 1 nit, which is fantastic in lowlight conditions.
The Galaxy S24 is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both the front and back, while the iPhone 16 features a Ceramic Shield front and a color-infused glass back. Both phones offer IP68 protection, making them dustproof and water-resistant up to 6 meters for 30 minutes.
The most important point that stands out regarding the displays is the refresh rate for each handset. In 2024, it’s embarrassing that the iPhone 16 (and iPhone 16 Plus), like previous models, is stuck at 60Hz, versus the 120Hz on the iPhone 16 Pro and Galaxy S24 series. A higher refresh rate provides a smartphone experience that is more visually pleasing, responsive, and comfortable, which is most noticeable during gaming. (The iPhone 17 is expected to offer a 120Hz refresh rate — finally.)
The Galaxy S24 features three familiar buttons: a side key and two for volume. The side key turns the screen on and off or locks the device, while the volume buttons allow you to control media, calls, and notifications.
The iPhone 16 also includes a side button for on or off functionality and volume up and down buttons. New to this model is a Camera Control button, which offers enhanced control of the phone’s Camera app during photo or video capture. This includes access to features such as zoom, focus, and exposure. The iPhone 16 also now has the Action button, a versatile and customizable feature first seen in the iPhone 15 Pro series. This button can be programmed to execute various simple and complex actions, enhancing the phone’s functionality and personalizing it to suit individual preferences.
Design is always a tough category to call, because so much of it is personal. The Camera Control button is a game-changer, but the 60Hz refresh rate really does hold the iPhone back. We’re giving this to the iPhone, largely because 60Hz on an iPhone doesn’t generally feel slow, and because the Camera Control button is very good.
Winner: Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: performance and software
Digital Trends
The Galaxy S24 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, a customized version of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 specifically designed for Samsung devices to deliver improved performance and efficiency. Our tests showed that the Galaxy S24 is fast and capable of handling everyday tasks without lag or stuttering. However, when taking many photos quickly, the phone became warm, although it never got too hot to hold.
The iPhone 16 is equipped with the all-new A18 chip, which Apple claims offers an improved CPU speed of up to 30% and 40% faster GPU performance compared to the A16 chip found in the iPhone 15. Despite these significant improvements, we did not notice substantial performance enhancements during our tests, possibly because the regular iPhones were already very fast.
However, the iPhone 16 includes an A18 chip, which will support Apple Intelligence (see below) when it’s released; the iPhone 15 did not.
The iPhone 16 runs iOS 18, and the Galaxy S24 includes Android 14. Your preference will likely come down to personal experience at this stage. But if you don’t have a choice, don’t worry. While they still have their differences, iOS and Android are generally quite similar these days, and it won’t take you long to find your footing when switching from one to the other. Apple usually offers iPhone users six to eight years of iOS updates, while Samsung has confirmed that Galaxy S24 users will receive seven years of Android updates.
It’s a tough category to call. The newer Apple phone has the edge in pure power, but whether that means a smoother experience is difficult to gauge because there are too many variables to consider.
Winner: Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: cameras
Apple
We’ve tested the camera systems on both phones. Overall, they offer mixed results.
First, it’s important to note that the Galaxy S24 has a triple rear camera system, while the iPhone 16 offers a dual camera system. The former offers a 50-megapixel main, 12MP ultrawide, and 10MP telephoto, while the latter provides a 48MP Fusion main and 12MP ultrawide. On the front, both have a 12MP selfie camera.
Our Galaxy S24 camera system test mainly yielded positive results. In the past, Samsung devices have been known for producing oversaturated colors in photos. However, thanks to improved algorithms governing color representation, the images now tend to be more accurate to life. Overall, images were much better when there was no movement when taking a shot. Otherwise, it can mean a blurry picture. Close-up shots with the Galaxy S24 were good, and the selfie camera was “just” decent.
The iPhone 16 features a 48-megapixel primary camera with 2x optical zoom, a 12MP ultrawide camera, and a 12MP selfie camera, similar to the iPhone 15. However, there are some significant changes.
The new iPhone introduces autofocus for the ultrawide camera, allowing macro photography and enabling the capture of spatial photos for viewing on an Apple Vision Pro. Additionally, the primary camera now has an anti-reflective lens coating and can capture pictures with zero shutter lag, a feature previously exclusive to Pro iPhones.
In our tests, the primary camera captured detailed photos with pleasing colors. The ultrawide camera performed well, though not exceptionally, and taking macro photos was enjoyable. The selfie camera on the iPhone remained as reliable as ever.
The standout feature across the entire iPhone 16 lineup is the physical Camera Control button on the phone’s right side, just below the power button. Pressing this button activates the Camera app, and a single press takes a photo while pressing and holding it records a video.
Additionally, the Camera Control has a capacitive sensor on its top. A light double press on the Camera Control, while the camera is open, activates a new UI for selecting various camera controls such as exposure, zoom, and styles. You can slide your finger across the Camera Control to cycle between them, lightly press the button to select one, and then slide your finger again to adjust the chosen control.
While this may present a learning curve, it’s a fun, new experience that shouldn’t take long to figure out. Furthermore, Apple Intelligence is adding more features.
Winner: iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: battery and charging
Christine Romero-Chan / Digital Trends
The Samsung Galaxy S24 has a 4,000mAh battery intended to last a full day with regular use; however, we could use more than a day on a single charge. On a down note, the basic Galaxy S24 model only supports charging speeds of up to 25 watts, unlike its larger counterparts, the Galaxy S24 Plus and Galaxy S24 Ultra, which support 45W charging.
On the wireless front, the Samsung phone does not support the new Qi2 wireless charging standard. Wireless charging is still possible but is limited to 15W, which may be slow. The phone also features reverse wireless charging, with a speed of up to 4.5W.
The iPhone 16 has a 4,685 mAh battery, allowing you to use the phone throughout the day without recharging. The standard iPhone 16 series now supports MagSafe charging up to 25W, an improvement from the previous 15W. In addition to MagSafe, the iPhone 16 also supports Qi2 and Qi wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, similar to the previous model.
In our tests using an Anker 747, the iPhone 16 charged from 5% to 60% in approximately 30 minutes, and it took 90 minutes to reach 100%. While charging from a low or dead battery to around 70% is quick, the final 30% takes longer.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 and the iPhone 16 have strong batteries, but neither is exceptional, which is expected as they are the more affordable flagship models from their respective companies. Therefore, we consider this a tie.
Winner: iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: AI
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
When history is written, this year’s smartphones will be remembered for being among the first to embrace artificial intelligence. The Galaxy S24 includes Galaxy AI, while the iPhone will eventually include Apple Intelligence. When discussing either of these products, it’s important to note they are both works in progress, especially in the case of Apple Intelligence, which has not yet been released.
Galaxy AI brings a range of advanced AI capabilities directly to Galaxy smartphones and tablets. It aims to provide intelligent and personalized experiences while enhancing the functionality of various features. These include an enhanced user experience, improved functionality, privacy and security, and offline accessibility.
Apple Intelligence, which the company revealed at the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in June, will eventually be found on every Apple product. It’s a suite of AI features designed to enhance productivity, creativity, and the overall user experience. It combines on-device and server-side processing to deliver powerful AI capabilities while prioritizing user privacy.
Apple Intelligence features will initially be divided into three broad categories: photo and video editing, writing, and contextural suggestions or automation.
The iPhone 16 series comes with iOS 18, which does not include Apple Intelligence. You will have to wait for iOS 18.1 and iOS 18.2 to be released later this year to access it. However, not all Apple Intelligence components will be available on the iPhone 16 series even after these updates arrive, as full releases might extend into 2025.
As an iPhone 16 buyer, you are promised to be among the first to experience the new tools, but since the biggest new features aren’t ready yet, this has to go to the Samsung phone.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy S24
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: price and availability
The starting price for each phone is $799, which includes 128GB of storage. For $859, you can get the Galaxy S24 with 256GB. The 256GB iPhone 16 model from Apple is priced at $899. Unlike Samsung, Apple offers a 512GB storage option for $1.099.
Availability is strong for both of these phones, as they’re some of the most popular phones on the planet. Walk into anyplace that sells phones and you’re going to be able to find these.
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: verdict
Joe Maring / Digital Trends
When deciding between the Galaxy S24 and iPhone 16, your choice may depend on whether you prefer Android or iOS. If you don’t have a strong preference for either operating system, the iPhone 16 is the better option. Historically, new iPhones released in the fall tend to outperform Galaxy S models released earlier in the year, and this pattern continues with the latest models.
While the Galaxy S24 might be available at slightly lower prices due to being slightly older, the iPhone 16 offers some advantages, such as access to 512GB of storage. Despite the price difference, the iPhone 16 stands out with its design, performance, camera, software, and additional hardware features like the Action button and Camera Control. Overall, the iPhone 16 is the preferred choice over the entry-level Galaxy S24.
https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/apple-iphone-16-vs-samsung-galaxy-s24/
Luis Diaz was fouled in Liverpool clash. (Photo by Eric Alonso/Getty Images)
Liverpool were 1-0 winners over Girona in the Champions League on Tuesday night and former Reds star Steve McManaman feels his old club got a little lucky. The Merseyside club arrived into the clash in Spain having won all five of their Champions League matches and Arne Slot’s men kept up their 100 per cent record with the victory.Girona caused Liverpool a lot of problems in the first half and the Reds boss can thank his goalkeeper Alisson Becker for keeping the home side out. The Merseyside outfit were much better in the second 45 minutes and it was during this half that the biggest talking point of the game emerged.Donny van de Beek would commit a clumsy challenge on Luis Diaz – who has recently been linked with a move away from Anfield – in the Girona box when the Dutch midfielder barely stepped on the winger’s heel.The referee viewed the coming together as a foul after being sent to the VAR monitor, resulting in Mohamed Salah converting the spot-kick.The incident sparked a lot of debate on social media and former Liverpool star Steve McManaman felt his old club were lucky to get the decision.
More Stories / Latest News
Steve McManaman on the Liverpool penalty incident
Liverpool star Luis Diaz earned Liverpool a penalty. (Photo by Eric Alonso/Getty Images)Speaking after the match, McManaman stated that he thought the penalty was harsh and compared it to the unpunished fouls that often happen during corners and free-kicks.“You expect the midfielders to go to close down and if you stand on an inch of his heel, it is very unfortunate,” the pundit said on TNT Sports. “With all respect, it is a contact game. We see a lot more contact at corners and free-kicks that go unmentioned so I don’t think it was a penalty regardless of the result.”
“He’s given the referee an opportunity to make a decision or VAR to get involved” ?@rioferdy5 and Steve McManaman give their verdict on Liverpool’s penalty ?
? @tntsports & @discoveryplusUK pic.twitter.com/wwH4emYXiI
— Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) December 10, 2024Liverpool will feel fortunate that they were awarded the penalty but Van de Beek gave the referee a decision to make after making the clumsy foul in their own box.Slot’s men were not at their best in Spain but as seen several times this season, the Reds found a way to come away from the match with all three points. https://www.caughtoffside.com/2024/12/10/liverpool-champions-league-tnt/
When it comes to home theater sound, one of the best brands to go with is Samsung. Over the last several years, Samsung surround sound systems and soundbars have done a phenomenal job at enhancing movie nights, which is why we’re always on the lookout for Samsung soundbar deals. As luck would have it, we came across a great one earlier today:
Right now, when you purchase the Samsung 3.1ch HW-Q6CC Soundbar, you’ll only pay $200. At full price, this model sells for $380.
Why you should buy the Samsung 3.1ch HW-Q6CC Soundbar
The HW-Q6CC is a Dolby Atmos soundbar, which means it can virtualize a full Atmos speaker configuration. Expect immersive audio, regardless of where you choose to sit or stand, plus a nice balance of highs, mids, and lows. And if you ever decide to relocate the soundbar to another room, Samsung’s Adaptive Sound Lite tech will automatically recalibrate the HW-Q6CC to the new space you place it in. Connectivity couldn’t be more effortless either: Thanks to HDMI eARC, you only have to worry about one wire going to your TV.
Far more than a home theater system, you’ll also be able to use the HW-Q6CC to stream music from a phone or tablet using Bluetooth. Pair two devices simultaneously and enjoy fast playback with Samsung’s Tap Sound feature, which lets you start playing a song from your phone through the Samsung soundbar just by tapping one device to the other.
While it’s hard to say how long this markdown is going to last, Samsung deals like this one have gone pretty quickly in the past. That being said, today might be the best day to save. Take $180 off the Samsung 3.1ch HW-Q6CC Soundbar when you purchase at Walmart, and be sure to check out our list of the best Walmart deals for even more holiday discounts!
https://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/samsung-hw-q6cc-soundbar-deal-walmart-december-2024/
The case in which two city lawyers are accused of forgery has taken a new twist after a prominent law firm has been implicated for alleged convenience in misleading court.
In the letter dated December 3, 2024 to the Inspector of Courts, pastor Daniel Walugembe has accused the lawyers, Robert Ssenfuka and Umar Nyanzi of SK and Partners Advocates of colluding with their colleagues at H&G Advocates to commit the alleged crimes.
Through his lawyers, Walugembe states that there is coordinated convenience between H&G Advocates and SK and Partners Advocates whose sole intention is to mislead and bias court against him which is very unfortunate and regrettable.
“Your worship, it is evident that in the letter written by H&G Advocates dated 23rd December 2021, requested for certified copies of proceedings, plaint, affidavit of service, and written statement of defense, consent judgment and decree in Civil Suit No. 699of 2017. Indeed in the letter dated 9th December 2022,” reads the petition adding that Natukunda Jeneva the Deputy Registrar certified the same documents.
According to the petition seeking for the intervention of the judiciary authorities into the matter, Walugembe insists that nowhere the registrar “gave any agreement to H&G advocates which they purportedly passed on to SK and Partners who are their conduits.”
Petition indicates that H&G Advocates is the law firm that represents Makerere University in the case litigated with Walugembe before the Land Division of the High Court; “But at no single point has H&G ever brought this purported sale agreement to disapprove or show inconsistent in his claim.”
The petition copied to the Chief Justice and other lawyers, the lawyers; Ssenfuka and Nyanzi are accused of concocting information and documents with a view of misleading court.
Through his lawyers of Alma Associated Advocates, Walugembe accused the lawyers of misleading court in the sworn statements to the principal judge that their client, Dr Ntwatwa Lule has never been party to earlier cases before the High Court.
“On that basis alone, it is our considered view that a person who can advise his client to lie on oath cannot be trusted at all. To demonstrate to you the perpetual lies of the accused persons in the affidavit they drafted for their client, drawn by SK and Partners Advocates, they advised their client to lie that he has never been party to application number 434 of 2019,” reads the complaint.
The petition copied to the chief justice, judicial authorities and lawyers was in response to complaints challenging the private prosecution of the lawyers Ssenfuka and Nyanzi.
Ssenfuka and Nyanzi both attached to SK & Partners Advocates are accused of fraud in regard to alleged forgery of agreements for Kibanja in Katanga near Wandegeya.
Last week, the Magistrates Court at Buganda Road, Jalia Basajjabalaba issued criminal summons against Ssenfuka and Nyanzi to answer accusations of forgery and uttering false
The duo is expected to appear in court on December 17, 2024 for plea taking and also for hearing formal application in which they are challenging the legality of the charges.
See also President Museveni’s Wealth Creation Message Transforms Lives in Gomba
It is alleged that the lawyers Ssenfuka and Nyanzi attached to SK & Partners Advocates while acting for and on behalf of their client, Dr Ntwatwa Lule committed criminal acts.
Court documents indicate that the accused lawyers are alleged to have committed forgery, uttering false documents and conspired to commit a felony when knowingly and unlawfully altered sales agreements dated February 9, 1996 and August 13, 1996 respectively.
H&G Advocates Accused of Forgery as Court Documents in Walugembe Case Face Scrutiny