Connect with us

Published

on

New permanent residents of Canada through the Parents and Grandparents Program (PGP) slowed in July compared to June, the latest data from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) reveals. In June, PGP immigration had eased off 7.1 per cent to only 3,015 new permanent residents compared to May’s strong performance. Then, in July, PGP immigration dipped by another 9.3 per cent with only 2,735 new permanent residents to Canada under that program that month. Immigration of parents to grandparents to Canada was markedly down in the first seven months of this year compared to the same period last year, dropping 10.3 per cent. By the end of July this year, Canada had welcomed 16,925 new permanent residents through the PGP program compared to 18,865 during the same period last year. The country could still, though, see a similar number of parents and grandparents immigrating to Canada this year through this sponsorship program compared to 2023 if the current immigration levels hold for the rest of this year. Projecting out to the rest of the year based on the first seven months of this year, Canada could welcome 29,014 new permanent residents through the PGP in 2024, 2.5 per cent more than the 28,305 who arrived under that program last year. Canada’s most populous province, Ontario, saw the greatest number of arrivals under the PGP in the first seven months of this year with 8,105 parents and grandparents settling there. The other provinces and territories attracted the following number of new permanent residents under the PGP during those seven months. Newfoundland and Labrador – 35 Prince Edward Island – 15 Nova Scotia – 125 New Brunswick – 50 Quebec – 1,245 Manitoba – 690 Saskatchewan – 465 Alberta – 3,280 British Columbia – 2,900 Yukon – 10 Northwest Territories – 5 Nunavut – 0  Across the country, Saskatchewan and Manitoba saw the biggest percentage gains in PGP immigration in July with Saskatchewan seeing 45.5-per cent growth in that program and Manitoba 16-per cent growth in the number of parents and grandparents becoming new permanent residents that month. Nova Scotia, Alberta Saw Biggest Monthly Drops In PGP Immigration In July The biggest percentage drops in PGP immigration in July were in Nova Scotia, where the number of parents and grandparents becoming new permanent residents fell by 40 per cent, and Alberta which experienced a 26.8-per cent decline in PGP immigration. With growing targets for total immigration to Canada, it seems likely PGP immigration will rise over the coming years.  Under the 2024-2026 Immigration Levels Plan, Canada is planning to welcome 485,000 new permanent residents this year, 500,000 in 2025 and then hold the line on immigration in 2026 with another 500,000 newcomers. That’s a total of 1.485 million immigrants to Canada over those three years. Under the PGP, applicants pay $1,050 to sponsor a parent or grandparent and the process takes up to 27 months, with the people being sponsored required to provide biometrics after they apply. That processing time includes the time to provide those biometrics. Once a Canadian citizen or permanent resident has submitted an interest in sponsoring these relatives, he or she is sent an Invitation to Apply (ITA) and must then submit two applications to the PGP: the sponsorship application, and; the permanent residence application. If those applications get the green light, the sponsor signs an agreement called an undertaking which starts on the day the sponsoree becomes a permanent resident of Canada. Among the several requirements which need to be met to determine eligibility to sponsor a parent or grandparent, are: a receipt of an Invitation to Apply; being at least 18 years old; Canadian residency; being a Canadian citizen, a permanent resident of Canada, or a person registered in Canada as an Indian under the Canadian Indian Act; sufficient funds to support the parent or grandparent; proof of income, although a spouse or common-law partner can co-sign to combine their income with that of the sponsor, and; meeting all other requirements under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.  Sponsors Ink Deal With Government To Financially Support Parents And Grandparents All sponsors living outside of the province of Quebec, which has its own immigration system, must promise to financially support the sponsorees for a period of time. This undertaking commits the sponsor to: providing financial support for sponsored family members for 20 years, starting when they become permanent residents; repaying any provincial social assistance (money from the government) sponsored family members get during that time, and; agreeing to certain responsibilities during the undertaking period in a sponsorship agreement. That sponsorship agreement means that the sponsor will provide the basic needs of the sponsoree, including: food; clothing; utilities; personal requirements; shelter; fuel; household supplies, and; healthcare not covered by public health insurance, such as eye and dental care. Sponsors Remain Financial Responsible For Relatives Even In Tough Times The sponsorship agreement is not one to be entered into lightly as it is obliges the sponsor to meet those requirements even in the case of: separation or divorce; family rifts; unemployment; change in finances, and even; death of the main applicant. Sponsors who live in Quebec must meet that province’s immigration sponsorship requirements after the IRCC approves of the sponsor. The length of the undertaking is 10 years for Quebec.  Due to the need for sponsors to accept responsibility for their parents and grandparents through sponsorship agreements under the PGP, past criminality and serious financial troubles can render a Canadian citizen or permanent resident ineligible for this program. Applicants may not be eligible to sponsor their parents or grandparents if the sponsors: are in a jail, prison or penitentiary; didn’t pay back an immigration loan or performance bond; failed to make court-ordered family support payments such as alimony or child support; didn’t give the financial support specified under a sponsorship agreement to sponsor someone else in the past; declared bankruptcy and are not discharged; receive social assistance for a reason other than a disability; were convicted of a violent criminal offence, any offence against a relative or any sexual offence inside or outside Canada, or; can’t legally stay in Canada and must leave the country because they received a removal order. The applicant cannot sponsor his or her spouse’s parents or grandparents, aka their in-laws, but can be a co-signer on that spouse’s application to bring to Canada his or her parents and grandparents.  The PGP program also does not allow a Canadian citizen or permanent resident to sponsor someone who is otherwise inadmissible to come to Canada. The PGP is restricted to the applicant’s own parents and grandparents, related by blood or adoption. IRCC Urges Applicants To Keep Their Information Current To Avoid Delays “In case of divorce, you’ll need to submit separate applications if you sponsor divorced parents and grandparents,” notes the IRCC on its website. “If your divorced parents or grandparents have a current spouse, common-law partner or a conjugal partner, these people become dependants on the application and can immigrate to Canada with your parents and grandparents, if approved.” A PGP application can include the sponsor’s own brothers and sisters, or half-brothers and sisters, or step-brothers and step-sisters – but only if they qualify as dependent children of the sponsor’s parents.  Delays in processing can quickly occur when the IRCC is faced with information which is no longer accurate and so Canadian immigration officials encourage applicants to keep their contact information and application details up to date. Important information which must be updated includes: changes in relationship status; birth or adoption of a child; death of an applicant or dependant; contact information such as e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and mailing addresses. The applicant is responsible for going into the application and updating it with this information him or herself. “Don’t mail us changes to your contact or application information,” notes the IRCC. “If you do, we won’t acknowledge your request and we won’t update your application.” Canadian immigration officials notify applicants under the PGP as soon as they begin to process the application, sending them both an application number and an acknowledgement of receipt of the application. The IRCC then assesses both the applicant’s eligibility as a sponsor and the person being sponsored for permanent residence. “If we refuse you as a sponsor, you can choose to have us keep processing the application for permanent residence for your family members,” notes the IRCC.  Choosing to have the IRCC continue processing the application at that point means the sponsor forgoes all fees which have been paid. By choosing to withdraw the application in the eventuality of being deemed ineligible to sponsor, the applicant can get all of his or her fees back, minus the $75 sponsorship fee. Once Canadian immigration officials have approved a sponsor under the PGP, they then turn their attention to the people being sponsored to determine their eligibility under the program. The IRCC will typically request documents from those being sponsored, including: medical exam results; police certificates, and; biometrics. Letters requesting that biometric information are sent to the parents or grandparents and their dependent children as named in the application and they then have 30 days to provide the biometric information at the closest collection point. https://immigration.ca/canada-has-welcomed-nearly-17000-parents-and-grandparent-immigrants-in-2024/

News

Ugandan Citizen Abducted, Held in Secret Detention for Three Months, Sparks Outrage and Calls for Justice

Published

on

A disturbing new case of unlawful detention has surfaced, highlighting the ongoing human rights crisis in Uganda. A Ugandan citizen was reportedly abducted and held in a secret facility, known as a “safe house,” for three months, only to be released without charge or explanation. This incident, reported by NTV Uganda, has sparked widespread condemnation and renewed calls for accountability regarding human rights abuses in the country.
While the details surrounding the abduction remain unclear, reports indicate that the individual was taken without due process and held incommunicado—an action that has long been condemned by human rights organizations. The victim’s release, with no charges filed and no clear justification, has angered activists and citizens, who view this as yet another case of egregious abuse of power by the state.
“This is a recurring pattern,” said one human rights activist. “Abductions, secret detentions, and unexplained releases have become all too common in Uganda. These acts violate fundamental human rights and erode public trust in the justice system.”
The use of “safe houses,” unregistered detention facilities reportedly operated by security forces, has been a focal point in numerous allegations of torture and illegal imprisonment. Despite repeated calls from both local and international organizations for their closure and accountability for those involved, little action has been taken to address these violations.
This case underscores the urgent need for reform within Uganda’s security apparatus and greater accountability for human rights abuses. Observers hope that drawing attention to these injustices will spur concrete action to bring those responsible to justice and ensure the protection of basic human rights.
As frustration mounts, calls for both domestic and international pressure to hold the government accountable for such crimes grow louder. “One day, there must be accountability for all these crimes against our people,” stated one social media user, reflecting the sentiments of many Ugandans.

Ugandan Citizen Abducted, Held in Secret Detention for Three Months, Sparks Outrage and Calls for Justice

Continue Reading

News

NUP Gathering Disrupted: Kyagulanyi Alleges Security Force Harassment and Arrests

Published

on

National Unity Platform (NUP) President Robert Kyagulanyi has accused Ugandan security forces of using excessive force to disrupt a planned NUP gathering. The allegations were detailed in a statement shared on Twitter, following an event held to honor children of NUP supporters who were killed, disappeared, or detained for their political beliefs.
According to Kyagulanyi, security personnel, under the command of an officer identified as Asiimwe, carried out a preemptive operation early in the morning upon learning of the NUP’s plans. The forces allegedly stormed the premises, arrested workers, and deployed tear gas to disperse those present.
“The criminals under the command of one Asiimwe deployed early morning, arrested our workers, and threw tear gas into our premises. They’ve cordoned off the premises and blocked all people from accessing the place,” Kyagulanyi wrote.
Among those reportedly arrested were Saava Peter, Mudenya Samson, and Turyasingura Samson. Kyagulanyi claimed the detained workers were subjected to beatings and interrogated about their political affiliations, with security operatives labeling them as terrorists.
“These JATT operatives asked the workers who they support politically, branding them terrorists and criminals—their only crime being that they work with us. You can imagine the indignity!” Kyagulanyi lamented.
This incident adds to the growing tension in Uganda’s political climate, where opposition parties frequently accuse the government of stifling dissent. Despite the challenges, Kyagulanyi ended his statement with a message of defiance and optimism, proclaiming, “UGANDA WILL BE FREE.”

NUP Gathering Disrupted: Kyagulanyi Alleges Security Force Harassment and Arrests

Continue Reading

News

Sudan Demands Apology from Uganda Over Army Chief Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s Threat to Invade Khartoum

Published

on

Sudan has demanded an official apology from Uganda over “offensive and dangerous” comments made by the chief of Uganda army staff, who threated to invade Khartoum, the Sudan Tribune has reported.
General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, son of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and CDF of the Ugandan army, posted two comments on the X platform on Tuesday in which he threatened “to capture Khartoum” with the support of the US President elect Donald Trump after he takes office. The posts were deleted later.
“The government of Sudan demands and official apology from the Ugandan government for the offensive and dangerous comments of the army commander,” Sudan’s foreign ministry said in a statement that the Sudan Tribune said it has seen.

Sudan Demands Apology from Uganda Over Army Chief Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s Threat to Invade Khartoum

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024