Five common mistakes in your immigration application that could lead to misrepresentation
Providing incorrect information on your immigration application – even unintentionally – can put you at risk of misrepresentation.
Misrepresentation is a legal term in Canadian immigration.
It refers to providing information to the Government of Canada that is both: untrue, misleading, or incomplete; and could cause an error in applying immigration law to the particular case.
Get a Free Express Entry Assessment
This includes information that the applicant gave or withheld directly, or someone else prepared or provided on behalf of the applicant (for example the Canadian sponsor in family class cases). Even if the applicant did not personally make the misrepresentation error, they may still be held accountable.
Misrepresentation is a serious offence according to section 40 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). Not only can it lead to your application getting rejected, but it can also have grave consequences such as fines, charges, being banned to apply for Canadian immigration for five years; and/or ordered to leave Canada.
Misrepresentation is also one of the possible factors that can lead to revocation of Canadian citizenship.
Some examples of misrepresentation include:
omitting, consciously or not, to include important information in your application
submitting altered or false documentation
lying about your health to your physician during your medical exam
declaring employment or educational experience you do not have
If I make an honest mistake on my immigration application, is that considered misrepresentation?
Misrepresentation can occur even if an applicant has made an honest mistake.
However, there is some nuance involved.
According to its official definition:
“A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible for misrepresentation for directly or indirectly misrepresenting or withholding material facts relating to a relevant matter that induces or could induce an error in the administration of this Act.”
This means that whether something is considered misrepresentation depends on the information that is provided (or withheld) and if it is considered “material” in a particular case.
Innocent misrepresentation is what happens when an applicant provides information material to their case, that they believe to be accurate but turns out to be wrong or incomplete.
For example, if you mistakenly list your job start date as 2016 instead of 2018, thus adding two more years of work experience, this could be considered misrepresentation if work experience is material to your case, even if it is just a typo. Another example would be failing to disclose a change in circumstance to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), like having a new spouse or a child.
Irrespective of intent, innocent misrepresentation, if material, may have the same consequences as intentional misrepresentation.
Some common mistakes that could lead to innocent misrepresentation:
Not reporting past marriages
You may mistakenly believe there is no real value in reporting a previous marriage in your immigration application. However, omitting this information will most likely be considered a misrepresentation.
For example, if you’re sponsoring a partner and fail to disclose two previous marriages within five years, immigration authorities may see this as relevant to their decision. Even if the omission was unintentional, it could put your application at risk.
Not reporting past crimes
Even if you don’t feel like thinking about or mentioning an offence that was committed years ago, you still must disclose this information. This applies to all criminal offences. Failure to provide this information can lead to misrepresentation. It doesn’t matter in which country the offence was committed.
Not reporting a visa refusal to enter Canada or another country
If you’ve ever been denied an entry visa into a country, this needs to be disclosed in an immigration application. This rule applies for any country – not just Canada or the United States. If you’ve been denied a temporary work permit, a visitor visa, a permanent residency visa, a study visa or any other type of visa and/or immigration application, it needs to be mentioned in your application.
Failure to report former military service or political activity
You might be reluctant to disclose your previous political activity, especially if you’re uncomfortable with sharing your political leanings.
However, for the purpose of immigration, it’s necessary to be open and honest about previous political activity. This also applies to military service and memberships to any parties and/or any political organizations.
Giving approximate information
When unsure about exact information, it’s tempting to give approximate dates or details. However, this can be risky. Authorities may find discrepancies and suspect misrepresentation. If you’re uncertain about specific facts, it’s better to admit your uncertainty than to provide inaccurate information.
By being thorough and honest in your application, you can avoid the risk of misrepresentation, including innocent misrepresentation.
What do I do if I’ve made a mistake in my immigration application?
The best thing to do would be to contact IRCC immediately and explain the situation.
This is not a guarantee that the misrepresentation will be forgiven or excused. However, it is regarded favourably compared to IRCC independently discovering it in the application.
If you’ve found out about the misrepresentation through a Procedural Fairness Letter (PFL), you should write a clear and comprehensive letter to address the concerns raised by IRCC as well as to provide as many supportive documents as possible.
IRCC sends a PFL to an applicant before an officer makes a final decision on misrepresentation. It gives the applicant a chance to explain any inaccuracies or mistakes.
Many applicants choose to hire a lawyer to prepare such letters and submissions to ensure they are as clear and concise as possible and avoid being accused of misrepresentation.
Get a Free Express Entry Assessment
Five common mistakes in your immigration application that could lead to misrepresentation
News
Ugandan Citizen Abducted, Held in Secret Detention for Three Months, Sparks Outrage and Calls for Justice
A disturbing new case of unlawful detention has surfaced, highlighting the ongoing human rights crisis in Uganda. A Ugandan citizen was reportedly abducted and held in a secret facility, known as a “safe house,” for three months, only to be released without charge or explanation. This incident, reported by NTV Uganda, has sparked widespread condemnation and renewed calls for accountability regarding human rights abuses in the country.
While the details surrounding the abduction remain unclear, reports indicate that the individual was taken without due process and held incommunicado—an action that has long been condemned by human rights organizations. The victim’s release, with no charges filed and no clear justification, has angered activists and citizens, who view this as yet another case of egregious abuse of power by the state.
“This is a recurring pattern,” said one human rights activist. “Abductions, secret detentions, and unexplained releases have become all too common in Uganda. These acts violate fundamental human rights and erode public trust in the justice system.”
The use of “safe houses,” unregistered detention facilities reportedly operated by security forces, has been a focal point in numerous allegations of torture and illegal imprisonment. Despite repeated calls from both local and international organizations for their closure and accountability for those involved, little action has been taken to address these violations.
This case underscores the urgent need for reform within Uganda’s security apparatus and greater accountability for human rights abuses. Observers hope that drawing attention to these injustices will spur concrete action to bring those responsible to justice and ensure the protection of basic human rights.
As frustration mounts, calls for both domestic and international pressure to hold the government accountable for such crimes grow louder. “One day, there must be accountability for all these crimes against our people,” stated one social media user, reflecting the sentiments of many Ugandans.
National Unity Platform (NUP) President Robert Kyagulanyi has accused Ugandan security forces of using excessive force to disrupt a planned NUP gathering. The allegations were detailed in a statement shared on Twitter, following an event held to honor children of NUP supporters who were killed, disappeared, or detained for their political beliefs.
According to Kyagulanyi, security personnel, under the command of an officer identified as Asiimwe, carried out a preemptive operation early in the morning upon learning of the NUP’s plans. The forces allegedly stormed the premises, arrested workers, and deployed tear gas to disperse those present.
“The criminals under the command of one Asiimwe deployed early morning, arrested our workers, and threw tear gas into our premises. They’ve cordoned off the premises and blocked all people from accessing the place,” Kyagulanyi wrote.
Among those reportedly arrested were Saava Peter, Mudenya Samson, and Turyasingura Samson. Kyagulanyi claimed the detained workers were subjected to beatings and interrogated about their political affiliations, with security operatives labeling them as terrorists.
“These JATT operatives asked the workers who they support politically, branding them terrorists and criminals—their only crime being that they work with us. You can imagine the indignity!” Kyagulanyi lamented.
This incident adds to the growing tension in Uganda’s political climate, where opposition parties frequently accuse the government of stifling dissent. Despite the challenges, Kyagulanyi ended his statement with a message of defiance and optimism, proclaiming, “UGANDA WILL BE FREE.”
NUP Gathering Disrupted: Kyagulanyi Alleges Security Force Harassment and Arrests
News
Sudan Demands Apology from Uganda Over Army Chief Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s Threat to Invade Khartoum
Sudan has demanded an official apology from Uganda over “offensive and dangerous” comments made by the chief of Uganda army staff, who threated to invade Khartoum, the Sudan Tribune has reported.
General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, son of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and CDF of the Ugandan army, posted two comments on the X platform on Tuesday in which he threatened “to capture Khartoum” with the support of the US President elect Donald Trump after he takes office. The posts were deleted later.
“The government of Sudan demands and official apology from the Ugandan government for the offensive and dangerous comments of the army commander,” Sudan’s foreign ministry said in a statement that the Sudan Tribune said it has seen.
Sudan Demands Apology from Uganda Over Army Chief Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s Threat to Invade Khartoum