Single-entry visas might dominate the landscape in Canada
Author: Al Parsai, LL.M, RCIC-IRB
Last Updated On: November 8, 2024
On November 6, 2024, IRCC published a new Program Delivery Instruction (PDI) affecting Temporary Resident Visa (TRV) applicants. This policy change has implications for individuals hoping to secure 10-year multiple-entry visas to Canada. The new guidelines could mean fewer 10-year TRVs for most applicants. Let’s explore the details of this change and its potential impact.
Key points about visas from the latest PDI
The new PDI provides insight into how immigration officers determine whether to issue a single-entry or multiple-entry visa. Here are the highlights:
Officer Discretion: Officers now have the flexibility to decide whether an applicant receives a single-entry or multiple-entry visa based on several factors.
Eligibility Considerations: Officers must evaluate the applicant’s situation, including the purpose of their visit, the applicant’s financial stability, and other factors that demonstrate ties to their home country.
Validity Period: The multiple-entry visa has a maximum validity of up to 10 years or until the expiry of the travel document or biometrics, whichever occurs first. Nonetheless, officers may issue a visa for a shorter period, especially when there is a short-term reason for the visit.
Factors influencing visa issuance
Under the new guidelines, IRCC has outlined several criteria that officers will consider when deciding whether to issue a single- or multiple-entry visa. These factors are crucial in shaping the fate of visa applications:
1. Purpose of the visit
The purpose of the visit plays a pivotal role in determining the type of visa issued. Officers assess whether the applicant needs to enter Canada multiple times or if their visit is more of a one-off nature. Some considerations include:
Is the visit for a conference, training, or tourism, where the applicant won’t return regularly?
Is the applicant visiting for compassion, such as caring for an ailing family member?
If the applicant is a minor, does the visit require parental approval each time?
2. Financial stability
The ability to finance trips to Canada is also important. Officers will evaluate whether:
The applicant has a stable and ongoing income source, such as employment, to support multiple visits.
The host in Canada is well-established and can finance the applicant’s visits, particularly if the host is also inviting other individuals.
A letter from the applicant’s employer attests to their funding the trip for work purposes.
3. Health considerations
The applicant’s health conditions are also under scrutiny:
Does the applicant have any health conditions that could worsen over time, and if so, have they provided a mitigation plan?
Are they travelling for medical treatment, and is adequate health insurance in place?
4. Ties to the home country
To assess whether an applicant intends to return to their home country, officers consider several aspects, including:
Employment status, family obligations, and other strong ties demonstrate an intention to return.
Previous travel history, including visits to Canada or other countries and compliance with visa conditions.
Past refusals of Canadian or other visas.
Potential impact of the changes
The issuance of 10-year multiple-entry TRVs might become more selective as IRCC seeks to evaluate applicants’ eligibility on a case-by-case basis, emphasizing stronger ties to home countries and clearer financial stability.
This change means that many applicants who previously qualified for a 10-year TRV might now receive a single-entry or multiple-entry visa with a shorter validity period. The new approach reflects a shift towards ensuring applicants have legitimate reasons to visit Canada more than once and are not merely relying on the broad availability of 10-year visas. Moreover, it could help reduce the number of temporary residents in Canada.
What does this mean for applicants?
Prepare Thorough Documentation: Applicants must provide detailed proof of financial stability and family ties to their home country.
More Scrutiny on Purpose: Each purpose of the visit will be scrutinized. Applicants should clearly articulate their reasons for entering Canada and justify any need for frequent travel.
Health Insurance is Crucial: Demonstrating a robust health insurance plan may help strengthen the application, particularly for applicants with health conditions or those visiting for medical reasons.
What’s Next?
The updated Program Delivery Instruction means many applicants may find the 10-year multiple-entry TRV more challenging. Immigration officers will make decisions based on multiple factors, and applicants should prepare accordingly. These changes reflect IRCC’s intention to ensure that temporary visits to Canada are for legitimate, well-supported reasons, which could affect thousands of people applying for a Canadian visa each year. Consider booking a consultation session so I can assess your circumstances. Alternatively, you may fill out the following form to contact our team.
Would you please fill out our free assessment form if you wish to visit or move to Canada? We will review it for free, but we will contact you only if we find an opportunity for you. Alternatively, you may book a consultation session. Consultation sessions are not free, but you will receive formal immigration advice from a licensed practitioner.
Al Parsai, LLM, MA, RCIC-IRB
Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant
Adjunct Professor – Queen’s University – Faculty of Law
Ashton College Instructor – Immigration Consulting
Author – 88 Tips on Immigration to Canada
Fill our Free Canada Immigration Assessment Form in your language!
Disclaimer:
The information on this website is provided for general informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current developments in immigration law. None of the authors or contributors to settler.ca are lawyers, and we do not provide legal advice. This content does not constitute legal or immigration advice and should not be relied upon as such. Accessing or using this website does not establish a consultant-client or any other professional relationship between you and Al Parsai or settler.ca. We make no warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information and disclaim liability for any errors or omissions.
Important Notes:
No Offices Outside Canada: We do not have any offices outside Canada. Therefore, anyone who claims to be our agent or representative outside Canada is committing fraud.
Official Contact Information: For our official contact information, please refer only to this website (settler.ca).
No Issuance of Immigration Documents: We do not issue work permits, study permits, or any other immigration documents. Only the Government of Canada has the authority to issue such documents.
Use of AI: We use AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Grammarly, to assist in generating content and images for this website. While we make reasonable efforts to review and monitor the materials, we cannot guarantee their accuracy, completeness, or compliance with current laws and regulations. AI-generated content may contain errors or omissions, and readers should not rely solely on this information without seeking professional advice.
Changes in Immigration Law: Immigration laws and regulations are subject to change without notice. If you have specific legal concerns, please consult a qualified lawyer. For personalized immigration (not legal) advice, you may book an appointment with Al Parsai, a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC-IRB) and Member in Good Standing with the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (CICC). We recommend verifying any information with official government sources or consulting a professional before making decisions.
Fictional Characters and Locations: Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all characters and locations mentioned in the articles are fictional. Any similarities to actual persons, living or dead, or real locations are coincidental.
Copyright Notice: © 2009-2024 settler.ca. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use, reproduction, or distribution of this content is strictly prohibited and may result in legal action.
Click to read the disclaimer.
Al Parsai, LL.M, RCIC-IRB
Al Parsai is a distinguished Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (L3 RCIC-IRB – Unrestricted Practice) hailing from vibrant Toronto, Canada. Al’s academic achievements include an esteemed role as an adjunct professor at prestigious Queen’s University Law School and Ashton College, as well as a Master of Laws (LLM) degree from York University (Osgood Hall Law School). A respected member of CICC, Al’s insights are further enriched by his experience as the dynamic CEO of Parsai Immigration Services. Guiding thousands of applicants from over 55 countries through the immigration process since 2011, Al’s articles offer a wealth of invaluable knowledge for readers.
News
Ugandan Citizen Abducted, Held in Secret Detention for Three Months, Sparks Outrage and Calls for Justice
A disturbing new case of unlawful detention has surfaced, highlighting the ongoing human rights crisis in Uganda. A Ugandan citizen was reportedly abducted and held in a secret facility, known as a “safe house,” for three months, only to be released without charge or explanation. This incident, reported by NTV Uganda, has sparked widespread condemnation and renewed calls for accountability regarding human rights abuses in the country.
While the details surrounding the abduction remain unclear, reports indicate that the individual was taken without due process and held incommunicado—an action that has long been condemned by human rights organizations. The victim’s release, with no charges filed and no clear justification, has angered activists and citizens, who view this as yet another case of egregious abuse of power by the state.
“This is a recurring pattern,” said one human rights activist. “Abductions, secret detentions, and unexplained releases have become all too common in Uganda. These acts violate fundamental human rights and erode public trust in the justice system.”
The use of “safe houses,” unregistered detention facilities reportedly operated by security forces, has been a focal point in numerous allegations of torture and illegal imprisonment. Despite repeated calls from both local and international organizations for their closure and accountability for those involved, little action has been taken to address these violations.
This case underscores the urgent need for reform within Uganda’s security apparatus and greater accountability for human rights abuses. Observers hope that drawing attention to these injustices will spur concrete action to bring those responsible to justice and ensure the protection of basic human rights.
As frustration mounts, calls for both domestic and international pressure to hold the government accountable for such crimes grow louder. “One day, there must be accountability for all these crimes against our people,” stated one social media user, reflecting the sentiments of many Ugandans.
National Unity Platform (NUP) President Robert Kyagulanyi has accused Ugandan security forces of using excessive force to disrupt a planned NUP gathering. The allegations were detailed in a statement shared on Twitter, following an event held to honor children of NUP supporters who were killed, disappeared, or detained for their political beliefs.
According to Kyagulanyi, security personnel, under the command of an officer identified as Asiimwe, carried out a preemptive operation early in the morning upon learning of the NUP’s plans. The forces allegedly stormed the premises, arrested workers, and deployed tear gas to disperse those present.
“The criminals under the command of one Asiimwe deployed early morning, arrested our workers, and threw tear gas into our premises. They’ve cordoned off the premises and blocked all people from accessing the place,” Kyagulanyi wrote.
Among those reportedly arrested were Saava Peter, Mudenya Samson, and Turyasingura Samson. Kyagulanyi claimed the detained workers were subjected to beatings and interrogated about their political affiliations, with security operatives labeling them as terrorists.
“These JATT operatives asked the workers who they support politically, branding them terrorists and criminals—their only crime being that they work with us. You can imagine the indignity!” Kyagulanyi lamented.
This incident adds to the growing tension in Uganda’s political climate, where opposition parties frequently accuse the government of stifling dissent. Despite the challenges, Kyagulanyi ended his statement with a message of defiance and optimism, proclaiming, “UGANDA WILL BE FREE.”
NUP Gathering Disrupted: Kyagulanyi Alleges Security Force Harassment and Arrests
News
Sudan Demands Apology from Uganda Over Army Chief Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s Threat to Invade Khartoum
Sudan has demanded an official apology from Uganda over “offensive and dangerous” comments made by the chief of Uganda army staff, who threated to invade Khartoum, the Sudan Tribune has reported.
General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, son of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and CDF of the Ugandan army, posted two comments on the X platform on Tuesday in which he threatened “to capture Khartoum” with the support of the US President elect Donald Trump after he takes office. The posts were deleted later.
“The government of Sudan demands and official apology from the Ugandan government for the offensive and dangerous comments of the army commander,” Sudan’s foreign ministry said in a statement that the Sudan Tribune said it has seen.
Sudan Demands Apology from Uganda Over Army Chief Muhoozi Kainerugaba’s Threat to Invade Khartoum